Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/6361
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAri, A.-
dc.contributor.authorTelli Atalay, Orçin-
dc.contributor.authorHarwood, R.-
dc.contributor.authorSheard, M.M.-
dc.contributor.authorAljamhan, E.A.-
dc.contributor.authorFink, J.B.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-16T12:06:30Z
dc.date.available2019-08-16T12:06:30Z
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.issn0020-1324-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/6361-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The effectiveness of aerosol drug delivery during mechanical ventilation is influenced by the patient, ventilator, and nebulizer variables. The impact of nebulizer type, position on the ventilator circuit, and bias flow on aerosol drug delivery has not been established for different age populations. OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of nebulizer position and bias flow with a jet nebulizer and a vibrating-mesh nebulizer on aerosol drug delivery in simulated and mechanically ventilated pediatric and adult patients. METHOD: Albuterol sulfate (2.5 mg) was nebulized with a jet nebulizer and a vibrating-mesh nebulizer, using simulated pediatric and adult lung models. The 2 nebulizer positions were: (1) jet nebulizer placed 15 cm from the Y-piece adapter, and vibrating-mesh nebulizer attached directly to the Y-piece; and (2) jet nebulizer placed prior to the heated humidifier with 15 cm of large-bore tubing, and vibrating-mesh nebulizer positioned at an inlet to the humidifier. A ventilator with a heated humidifier and ventilator circuit was utilized in both lung models. The adult ventilator settings were VT 500 mL, PEEP 5 cm H2O, respiratory rate 20 breaths/min, peak inspiratory flow 60 L/min, and descending ramp flow waveform. The pediatric ventilator settings were VT 100 mL, PEEP 5 cm H2O, respiratory rate 20 breaths/min, inspiratory time 1 s. We tested bias flows of 2 and 5 L/min. The adult and pediatric lung models used 8-mm and 5-mm inner-diameter endotracheal tubes, respectively. Each experiment was run 3 times (n = 3). The albuterol sulfate was eluted from the filter and analyzed via spectrophotometry (276 nm). RESULTS: Nebulizer placement prior to the humidifier increased drug delivery with both the jet nebulizer and the vibrating-mesh nebulizer, with a greater increase with the vibrating-mesh nebulizer. Higher bias flow reduced drug delivery. Drug delivery with the vibrating-mesh nebulizer was 2-4-fold greater than with the jet nebulizer at all positions (P < .05) in both lung models. CONCLUSION: During simulated mechanical ventilation in pediatric and adult models, bias flow and nebulizer type and position impact aerosol drug delivery. © 2010 Daedalus Enterprises.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofRespiratory Careen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAerosol drug deliveryen_US
dc.subjectBias flowen_US
dc.subjectDrug administrationen_US
dc.subjectJet nebulizeren_US
dc.subjectMechanical ventilationen_US
dc.subjectNebulizer positionen_US
dc.subjectVibrating-mesh nebulizeren_US
dc.subjectsalbutamol sulfateen_US
dc.subjectbronchodilating agenten_US
dc.subjectsalbutamolen_US
dc.subjectaerosolen_US
dc.subjectarticleen_US
dc.subjectartificial ventilationen_US
dc.subjectbreathing rateen_US
dc.subjectdrug delivery systemen_US
dc.subjectendotracheal tubeen_US
dc.subjecthumidifieren_US
dc.subjectjet nebulizeren_US
dc.subjectmedical nebulizeren_US
dc.subjectpeak inspiratory flowen_US
dc.subjectpositive end expiratory pressureen_US
dc.subjectsimulationen_US
dc.subjectspectrophotometryen_US
dc.subjectventilatoren_US
dc.subjectvibrating mesh nebulizeren_US
dc.subjectadulten_US
dc.subjectaudiovisual equipmenten_US
dc.subjectcomparative studyen_US
dc.subjectequipment designen_US
dc.subjecthumanen_US
dc.subjectinhalational drug administrationen_US
dc.subjectmethodologyen_US
dc.subjectnebulizeren_US
dc.subjectpediatricsen_US
dc.subjectAdministration, Inhalationen_US
dc.subjectAdulten_US
dc.subjectAerosolsen_US
dc.subjectAlbuterolen_US
dc.subjectBronchodilator Agentsen_US
dc.subjectEquipment Designen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectModels, Anatomicen_US
dc.subjectNebulizers and Vaporizersen_US
dc.subjectPediatricsen_US
dc.subjectRespiration, Artificialen_US
dc.titleInfluence of nebulizer type, position, and bias flow on aerosol drug delivery in simulated pediatric and adult lung models during mechanical ventilationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume55en_US
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.startpage845
dc.identifier.startpage845en_US
dc.identifier.endpage851en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-1613-9192-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.pmid20587095en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-77955507884en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000280037300002en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1-
dc.ownerPamukkale University-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.dept16.01. Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation-
Appears in Collections:Fizik Tedavi ve Rehabilitasyon Yüksekokulu Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

214
checked on Jun 29, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

190
checked on Jul 10, 2024

Page view(s)

48
checked on May 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check





Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.