Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11499/6361
Title: | Influence of nebulizer type, position, and bias flow on aerosol drug delivery in simulated pediatric and adult lung models during mechanical ventilation | Authors: | Ari, A. Telli Atalay, Orçin Harwood, R. Sheard, M.M. Aljamhan, E.A. Fink, J.B. |
Keywords: | Aerosol drug delivery Bias flow Drug administration Jet nebulizer Mechanical ventilation Nebulizer position Vibrating-mesh nebulizer salbutamol sulfate bronchodilating agent salbutamol aerosol article artificial ventilation breathing rate drug delivery system endotracheal tube humidifier jet nebulizer medical nebulizer peak inspiratory flow positive end expiratory pressure simulation spectrophotometry ventilator vibrating mesh nebulizer adult audiovisual equipment comparative study equipment design human inhalational drug administration methodology nebulizer pediatrics Administration, Inhalation Adult Aerosols Albuterol Bronchodilator Agents Equipment Design Humans Models, Anatomic Nebulizers and Vaporizers Pediatrics Respiration, Artificial |
Abstract: | BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of aerosol drug delivery during mechanical ventilation is influenced by the patient, ventilator, and nebulizer variables. The impact of nebulizer type, position on the ventilator circuit, and bias flow on aerosol drug delivery has not been established for different age populations. OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of nebulizer position and bias flow with a jet nebulizer and a vibrating-mesh nebulizer on aerosol drug delivery in simulated and mechanically ventilated pediatric and adult patients. METHOD: Albuterol sulfate (2.5 mg) was nebulized with a jet nebulizer and a vibrating-mesh nebulizer, using simulated pediatric and adult lung models. The 2 nebulizer positions were: (1) jet nebulizer placed 15 cm from the Y-piece adapter, and vibrating-mesh nebulizer attached directly to the Y-piece; and (2) jet nebulizer placed prior to the heated humidifier with 15 cm of large-bore tubing, and vibrating-mesh nebulizer positioned at an inlet to the humidifier. A ventilator with a heated humidifier and ventilator circuit was utilized in both lung models. The adult ventilator settings were VT 500 mL, PEEP 5 cm H2O, respiratory rate 20 breaths/min, peak inspiratory flow 60 L/min, and descending ramp flow waveform. The pediatric ventilator settings were VT 100 mL, PEEP 5 cm H2O, respiratory rate 20 breaths/min, inspiratory time 1 s. We tested bias flows of 2 and 5 L/min. The adult and pediatric lung models used 8-mm and 5-mm inner-diameter endotracheal tubes, respectively. Each experiment was run 3 times (n = 3). The albuterol sulfate was eluted from the filter and analyzed via spectrophotometry (276 nm). RESULTS: Nebulizer placement prior to the humidifier increased drug delivery with both the jet nebulizer and the vibrating-mesh nebulizer, with a greater increase with the vibrating-mesh nebulizer. Higher bias flow reduced drug delivery. Drug delivery with the vibrating-mesh nebulizer was 2-4-fold greater than with the jet nebulizer at all positions (P < .05) in both lung models. CONCLUSION: During simulated mechanical ventilation in pediatric and adult models, bias flow and nebulizer type and position impact aerosol drug delivery. © 2010 Daedalus Enterprises. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/11499/6361 | ISSN: | 0020-1324 |
Appears in Collections: | Fizik Tedavi ve Rehabilitasyon Yüksekokulu Koleksiyonu PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
Show full item record
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
216
checked on Nov 23, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
196
checked on Nov 22, 2024
Page view(s)
62
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.